Shear banding and flow instabilities in wormlike micelles: Modelling and mechanisms – A review
Vol. 20., No.5., Pages 473-488, 2026
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2026.36
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2026.36
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT
Worm-like micelles (WLMs) are dynamic, self-assembling supramolecular structures that exhibit complex viscoelastic behaviour due to their ability to undergo reversible scission, fusion, branching, and sequence rearrangement. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent theoretical advances in modelling WLM rheology, from classical reptation–scission theories to modern stochastic simulations and multi-scale population-balance frameworks. A central challenge addressed is the rheological indistinguishability of competing models under linear conditions, which renders inverse modelling ill-posed and necessitates the integration of experimental data, such as cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM), small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), and flow birefringence, to constrain theoretical predictions. The article further explores the limitations of conventional models in capturing nonlinear responses, including shear banding and extensional strain hardening, and emphasizes the need for spatially resolved, structurally informed constitutive equations. Emerging tools, including neural networks and hybrid modular frameworks, are identified as promising solutions for bridging microscopic rearrangement dynamics with macroscopic flow behaviour. Ultimately, the development of predictive, physically grounded WLM models will be essential for advancing applications in formulation science, smart materials, and industrial processing.
RELATED ARTICLES
Szabolcs Horváth, József Gábor Kovács
Vol. 19., No.3., Pages 246-257, 2025
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2025.19
Vol. 19., No.3., Pages 246-257, 2025
DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2025.19

Measuring the viscosity of the melt contributes to the quality of injection molded products. Injection molding machines cannot give much feedback on the processes in the cavity, so pressure measurement inside the mold facilitates quality supervision. Our goal is to get more information about the viscosity of the material during filling in a traditional injection mold. A suitable and cost-effective method is to install cavity pressure sensors for the in-situ viscosity measurement. We prepared an experimental mold with variable wall thickness and 80×80 mm cavity dimensions. We implemented eight pressure sensors in each cavity. The wall thickness varied from 1 to 4 mm, and apparent viscosity was determined at different shear rates and mold temperatures. We measured non-isothermal and non-adiabatic flow during filling. The environment was quite different from that of standard measuring equipment. Based on the results, we effectively measured the material viscosity with a non-heated mold in the case of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and polypropylene (PP) material. The results were validated by measuring viscosity with a capillary rheometer and compared to our method using the non-heated mold, and the error was less than 10%. The results were accurate in a specific speed wall thickness range with PP and ABS.




